It was not until I read this post on The Shifted Librarian did I realize... June 17th was Firefox 3 download day! A total of 8,002,530 people downloaded Firefox on that day and they set a Guinness Record! I did download Firefox 3 very recently but I don't think I did it on the 17th. Too bad. There is even a certificate that you can download saying that you helped setting a World Record. Oh well... Still proud to be a ff user.
The graphic is too cute so I have to put it here. Credit goes to Matthew Inman and his State of the Web - Summer 2008.
Friday, July 11, 2008
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Soon to be launched -- LCPL's catalog review/rating system via Chilifresh
I'm so excited. In one week we are going to launch our catalog review/rating system via Chilifresh. I first heard about them in February on Horizon-L, and have been trying to push for it since. Lots of other Horizon libraries have signed on and it was only until last week my boss finally gave a go after we made sure we have the money to pay for it (the price is very reasonable, it's just that we were too short of money!).
Folks at Chilifresh have been very responsive even we are only still on free trail. I am so excited and hope that our patrons will like this new service. It would have been even nicer if we could do this in-house but we just don't have enough man-power or resources. Chilifresh is the second best thing! Easy to implement, takes me very little time to put it up and is quite flexible.
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
The more the better! But what happened if they are scattered all over the place!
We have our summer reading program going on at the library I work for. The library purchased the software/program from Evanced to handle the online reading logs, and reviews for the program. This is not in my area and I was never involved in the decision making process. Anyway it is up and running as it is, and as far as I know we have a pretty good turn out. Lots of patrons signed up online and posted their reviews.
On the other hand, I have pushed to purchase yet another catalog review/rating engine for our library -- Chilifresh. It can be easily integrated into our online catalog and is already very popular among some public libraries. Anyway, this will be yet another place for our patrons to post reviews.
Now here comes the question. What to do with these reviews posted on our Summer Reading Program after it ends. This was asked by a staff member on our staff blog. Are we simply going to just delete them? Keep them for next summer? Add them to our online catalog? (well this person does not know that this cannot be easily done)
The person asking the question does not know about the Chilifresh project I am working on but this person asked a very good question. It is a key to think about how we offer our services.
More is better, isn't it? More services to our patrons is of course better. But what happens if they are scattered all over the place?? Does that really offer much convenience to our patrons? Log in here to leave a review in our SRP... log in there to leave a review on our catalog...
This is not user friendly at all. More is not better when you are sending patrons all over the place to do things they should be able to do in one place.
I do not have a specific solution to the issue that our staff raised. I don't think that there is a way for Chilifresh to load the reviews we got from Evanced into their database so that they will show up in our catalog. We may have to manually do this if we want to preserve the reviews our patrons wrote for the Summer Reading Program.
If only we could have thought more about these two separate but yet similar services we are offering to our patrons and planned a better way to integrate them rather than offering both but at separate places. Personally I don't like the review section on Evanced. It looks pretty ugly. There is a rating system but it does not display. On the other hand, Chilifresh has a star rating system that displays right up front. The reviews look like they are part of our catalog. We get reviews from not just our patrons but from all participating libraries.
I don't know how my boss will answer our staff. I am just frustrated that we did not do a better planning job as we should have, and I feel like we do not have the vision to offer more integrated an user-friendly services to our patrons.
On the other hand, I have pushed to purchase yet another catalog review/rating engine for our library -- Chilifresh. It can be easily integrated into our online catalog and is already very popular among some public libraries. Anyway, this will be yet another place for our patrons to post reviews.
Now here comes the question. What to do with these reviews posted on our Summer Reading Program after it ends. This was asked by a staff member on our staff blog. Are we simply going to just delete them? Keep them for next summer? Add them to our online catalog? (well this person does not know that this cannot be easily done)
The person asking the question does not know about the Chilifresh project I am working on but this person asked a very good question. It is a key to think about how we offer our services.
More is better, isn't it? More services to our patrons is of course better. But what happens if they are scattered all over the place?? Does that really offer much convenience to our patrons? Log in here to leave a review in our SRP... log in there to leave a review on our catalog...
This is not user friendly at all. More is not better when you are sending patrons all over the place to do things they should be able to do in one place.
I do not have a specific solution to the issue that our staff raised. I don't think that there is a way for Chilifresh to load the reviews we got from Evanced into their database so that they will show up in our catalog. We may have to manually do this if we want to preserve the reviews our patrons wrote for the Summer Reading Program.
If only we could have thought more about these two separate but yet similar services we are offering to our patrons and planned a better way to integrate them rather than offering both but at separate places. Personally I don't like the review section on Evanced. It looks pretty ugly. There is a rating system but it does not display. On the other hand, Chilifresh has a star rating system that displays right up front. The reviews look like they are part of our catalog. We get reviews from not just our patrons but from all participating libraries.
I don't know how my boss will answer our staff. I am just frustrated that we did not do a better planning job as we should have, and I feel like we do not have the vision to offer more integrated an user-friendly services to our patrons.
This is when I really regret that I don't have a CS background...
and/or too lazy (according to hubby) to pick up any significant programming skills!! AW!!!
Library Applications Developer
The Brown University Library seeks a talented software developer to design new and innovative web-based library services, systems, and tools which anticipate the needs of library users.
In addition to developing new applications, the incumbent
Library Applications Developer
The Brown University Library seeks a talented software developer to design new and innovative web-based library services, systems, and tools which anticipate the needs of library users.
In addition to developing new applications, the incumbent
- makes creative use of APIs
- continually enhances and extends commercial software applications
- works with library departments to develop tools which increase internal workflow efficiencies
- provides vision and leadership in the investigation and implementation of emerging information technologies
The Library Applications Developer is part of the Library's Integrated Technology Services department.
Qualifications:
- Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Information Science, or a related field; or the equivalent combination of education and experience.
- Experience in the designand manipulation of relational databases; demonstrated proficiency in developing and maintaining database-driven web applications
- Experience developing and coding interactive web applications using PHP, Python, Ruby, Perl, HTML, XML, CSS , SQL, Javascript, AJAX, and/or other common tools. (AW!)
- Demonstrated experience with Unix or Linux server platforms, related software, and basic system administration utilities
- In depth knowledge of Website design, development, implementation, standards, and accessibility/usability guidelines.
- Experience with Web 2.0 technologies such as RDF and AJAX and with designing and implementing web services (REST). Ability to integrate Web 2.0 services to ensure the seamless delivery (this is the key!) of online library services.
- Excellent communication, interpersonal, and organizational skills
- Creativity and strong analytical and problem-solving skills
Ability to learn new technical skills quickly; ability to meet deadlines; strong service-orientation. Ability to adapt emerging technologies to new domains.
Preferred Qualifications:
- MLS from an ALA accredited university
- Hands-on experience implementing and managing library enterprise systems
Ok so I am not a programmer and probably will never be. But where could one go to work with someone like that? That would be any system librarian's dream to work with a team of developer(s).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)